A new conjecture to unify Fourier restriction and Bochner-Riesz
Prof. Ruixiang Zhang
2023-07-14 15:30-16:30
MCM110&Online
Speaker: Prof. Ruixiang Zhang (UC Berkeley)Time: 15:30-16:30 July 14, 2023 (Friday)
Place: MCM110 & Online (Zoom ID: 6165230607 Password: mcm1234)
Title: A new conjecture to unify Fourier restriction and Bochner-Riesz
Abstract: The Fourier restriction conjecture and the Bochner-Riesz conjecture ask for Lebesgue space mapping properties of certain oscillatory integral operators. They both are central in harmonic analysis, are open in dimensions $\geq 3$, and notably have the same conjectured exponents. In the 1970s, H\"{o}rmander asked if a more general class of operators (known as H\"{o}rmander type operators) all satisfy the same $L^p$-boundedness as in the above two conjectures. A positive answer to H\"{o}rmander's question would resolve the above two conjectures and have more applications such as in the manifold setting. Unfortunately H\"{o}rmander's question is known to fail in all dimensions $\geq 3$ by the work of Bourgain and many others. It continues to fail in all dimensions $\geq 3$ even if one adds a ``positive curvature'' assumption which one does have in restriction and Bochner-Riesz settings. Bourgain showed that in dimension $3$ one always has the failure unless a derivative condition is satisfied everywhere. Joint with Shaoming Guo and Hong Wang, we generalize this condition to arbitrary dimension and call it ``Bourgain's condition''. We unify Fourier restriction and Bochner-Riesz by conjecturing that any H\"{o}rmander type operator satisfying Bourgain's condition should have the same $L^p$-boundedness as in those two conjectures. As evidences, we prove that the failure of Bourgain's condition immediately implies the failure of such an $L^p$-boundedness in every dimension. We also prove that current techniques on the two conjectures apply equally well in our conjecture and make some progress on our conjecture that consequently improves the two conjectures in higher dimensions. I will talk about some history and some interesting components in our proof.
